Every person at one
point in time or another must face some personal struggles in their life. How
an individual copes with these struggles is a crucial factor in their recovery
process. Some coping methods are healthy and would evoke results that are
beneficial to a person’s well-being; such as speaking with a therapist. Whereas
other coping methods can be quite unhealthy and yield unpleasant behaviors that
can cause psychological damage or even be detrimental. For instance, people may
seek refuge from a bottle and turn to alcoholism, fall victim to drugs and
other vices or they may just not try to deal with the issue at all which can
cause an internal dissonance which may eventually lead to suicide. What about
self-defeating humour though? If this coping mechanism healthy or not?
Self-defeating humour
is where one puts themselves down in a “joking” fashion so as to seek the
approval of others and try to fit it. Maybe it is even a case of making fun of
yourself before someone else has the chance to do so. Up until now, a
significant deal of the research literature has suggested that self-defeating
humour is exclusively associated with negative psychological effects among
individuals who regularly employ this style of humour. However, a research team
at the University of Granada (UGR) from the Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research
Centre (CIMCYC) have established that individuals who frequently use
self-defeating humour aimed at gaining the approval of others through self-mockery
exhibit greater levels of psychological well-being.
The main objective of
the present research was to develop a comprehensive assessment of the Humor
Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) in independent large samples of the Spanish
population thus the study was carried out in Spain. To achieve this goal,
researchers Jorge Torres-Marín et al performed traditional psychometric
analyses to examine the internal consistency and factor structure of the HSQ.
Moreover, they conducted a series of three studies to obtain external validity
evidence by replicating the relationships between humor styles and
psychological well-being and personality variables.
Humor styles have
been defined as behavioral tendencies related to the use of humor in everyday
life and in this study they were divided into four independent although related
dimensions: affiliative, aggressive, self-enhancing, and self-defeating. Affiliative
humour, is aimed at strengthening social relationships. Self-enhancing humour,
meanwhile, entails maintaining a humorous outlook in potentially stressful and
adverse situations. These types of humour have consistently been linked to
indicators of positive psychological well-being such as happiness, satisfaction
with life, hope, etc. but also to more negative states such as depression and
anxiety.
A total of 1068
people were divided into 5 different samples based on their ages, educational
backgrounds and work experience. The items on the HSQ were rated on a
seven-point Likert-scale format ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally
agree). On one
hand, the results regarding the relationship between the use of humour and
anger management suggest that the capacity for maintaining a humorous
perspective in adverse situations, i.e. the use of self-enhancing humour, is
typically found among people who manage anger more effectively, as well as
among those with lower tendencies to exhibit angry feelings or reactions. On
the other hand however, people who tend to use aggressive or self-defeating
humour do not manage anger or rage as well. Meanwhile, self-defeating humour
was linked to a greater tendency to suppress anger. However, this suppression
does not necessarily a good thing and it does not mean that the anger directed
at others is reduced or controlled, but rather that the triggers eliciting such
angry reactions are concealed or not explicitly stated.
The research carried
out at the UGR provides a highly useful tool (HSQ) for exploring predispositions
related to the use of humour among the Spanish population and can be further
used and analysed in other countries and cultures.
Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180208104225.htm
Researchers: Jorge Torres-Marín, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Hugo Carretero-Dios
I think the first paragraph is great, while it will be better if the last paragraph could be longer, maybe you can add some advice:-D
回覆刪除Some terms in your article are too abstract for the general public to understand(like "external validity evidence"). Maybe you can replace them with simpler ones, or try to explain the concept! :)
回覆刪除Good read, but maybe too strict towards the article. Possibly could have added personal experience or more relatable to your everyday people, especially in the conclusion. Also, next time you could possibly use more simplified words for larger terms.
回覆刪除